Should the government tax 67% of investment profits (capital gains) instead of the historical 50%?

This issue centers on the "inclusion rate," which determines how much of a profit from selling assets (like stocks, cottages, or businesses) is treated as taxable income. Historically set at 50%, recent legislation raised this to roughly 67% for corporations and high-earning individuals to address wealth inequality and fund budget deficits. Critics argue this "tax on innovation" creates a "brain drain" of talent and discourages productivity, while affecting middle-class professionals like doctors who save for retirement through corporate holdings. Proponents argue it is a necessary step for "generational fairness" to ensure the wealthy contribute more to the social safety net. Opponents argue it stifles economic growth and punishes risk-takers.