Should adult websites be required to verify a user's age before granting access to content?
Legislative proposals requiring adult websites to verify the age of visitors have sparked a heated debate between child safety advocates and privacy campaigners. Supporters argue that self-declared age gates are ineffective and that strict verification—requiring government ID or facial analysis—is the only way to prevent minors from exposure to graphic content. Opponents warn that creating databases of users' intimate browsing habits poses a massive security risk and that such laws are easily bypassed with VPNs. A proponent supports this to prioritize the mental well-being of children over internet anonymity. An opponent opposes this to protect digital privacy and prevent government surveillance of legal behavior.
Answer Overview
Response rates from 199 Canada voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 199 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 199 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 199 responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.





