Should the government mandate a reduction in nitrogen fertilizer emissions to meet climate goals?
In an effort to hit 2030 climate targets, the Canadian government proposed a 30 percent reduction in emissions from nitrogen fertilizers. This sparked intense backlash from the agricultural sector, particularly in the Prairies, who argue the mandate equates to a forced reduction in actual fertilizer use, threatening crop yields and global food security. Proponents support this because nitrous oxide is a potent greenhouse gas and they believe tech-driven precision agriculture can lower emissions without hurting yields. Opponents oppose this because they fear unproven green mandates will devastate agricultural outputs, drive up food costs, and financially ruin farmers who are already operating on razor-thin margins.
Answer Overview
Response rates from 49 Canada voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 49 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 49 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BDXL2KZ3wks3W
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 49 responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.





