ChatGPTNo, we cannot afford to add this at the moment |
People’s Party answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, we cannot afford to add this at the moment
The PPC is focused on reducing government spending and taxes, so they would likely agree that adding prescription drug coverage to Canada's universal healthcare plan is not affordable at the moment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The PPC has not explicitly stated their position on prescription drug coverage, but their general stance on smaller government and reduced spending suggests they would likely lean towards not covering prescription drugs under Canada's universal healthcare plan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Regardless, enact regulations to cap the price of drugs
The PPC has not explicitly stated their position on this specific proposal, but they have expressed concerns about the high cost of prescription drugs. However, their general stance on smaller government and reduced intervention suggests they might not strongly support enacting regulations to cap drug prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded
The PPC has not explicitly stated their position on this specific proposal, but their general stance on smaller government and reduced spending suggests they would likely not strongly support covering prescription drugs only when a high cost threshold is exceeded, as it still involves government intervention and spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for low income families
While the PPC has not explicitly stated their position on this specific proposal, their general stance on smaller government and reduced spending suggests they would likely not support covering prescription drugs only for low-income families, as it still involves government intervention and spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, cover the overall prescription costs but have the patient pay the pharmacy dispensing costs
The PPC has not explicitly stated their position on this specific proposal, but their general stance on smaller government and reduced spending suggests they would likely not support covering overall prescription costs while having patients pay pharmacy dispensing costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The People's Party of Canada (PPC) generally advocates for smaller government and reduced spending. They have not explicitly supported covering prescription drugs under Canada's universal healthcare plan, and their platform focuses on reducing taxes and government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
People’s Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, cover the overall prescription costs but have the patient pay the pharmacy dispensing costs
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 525 voters that identify as People’s Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.