Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2013)
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 5.2k Fiscal Conservatism voters.
60% Yes |
40% No |
45% Yes |
40% No |
12% Yes, but only for low income families |
|
3% Yes, but encourage stay-at-home parenting |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 5.2k Fiscal Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 5.2k Fiscal Conservatism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Fiscal Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@4XJP9HC4yrs4Y
No, encourage stay-at-home parenting
@4SCCFZV4yrs4Y
We live in a patriarchal society; when Canada started doing "women in non traditional trades" they left out the other half of the equation which was to teach men how to multi task. Child rearing needs to be revered instead of being viewed as 'less than'. It is not just a universal child tax, we need a complete overhaul of wages to reflect the importance and tax breaks for people choosing to raise their own children instead of farming that out to a daycare.
@53HLLTK4yrs4Y
A percentage, based on income
@4VPBQML4yrs4Y
No, women belong in the kitchen and should take care of her children at home
@9F5KMPV1yr1Y
Government should provide free day care to all children. Daycare shouldn't be something parents have to pay out of pocket for.
@9F5FC8S 1yr1Y
Their federal government should subsidize child care for families that meet a mindful and appropriate guideline for need, which isn’t always limited to low income families. Families with more than three children should not qualify for subsidized child care, unless the family is blended or the third pregnancy resulted in multiples that are not the product of IVF. Private day care should continue to be available to families who choose it.
@9F2MK7G1yr1Y
Should be a provincial responsibility
Join in on the most popular conversations.