Response rates from 123k Canada voters.
56% Yes |
44% No |
45% Yes |
38% No |
11% Yes, but only for non-essential services |
7% No, but establish a labour court to preempt and mediate strikes |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 123k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 123k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@4D4DL895yrs5Y
No, most government workers are corrupt and lazy. They should be monitored 24/7 and fired if they aren't productive.
@9D536B22yrs2Y
Yes, but only for non-essential services. Essential services should have labour courts to mediate strikes.
@4LM4WSK5yrs5Y
Yes, excluding Canada Post workers.
@8PS9XBV5yrs5Y
Yes, but they should stop whining and just work. The work will give them self satisfaction and possible reward. You're the one who needed a job, be grateful.
@B56FD972mos2MO
add restricitons on how they can strike, and what they can do while on strike. also make sure services are still open for the public to use while the employees are on strike (example: have only a portion of employees strike, and have the rest keep on working, to ensure services can still be used).
@B54MSXX2mos2MO
I believe every one has the right to strike. But I’m also not in favor of how unions are currently run.
@8NW7V4J5yrs5Y
No government unions are an obvious conflict of interest.
@B49T48V3mos3MO
Yes but binding on third party arbitration should be an option available to force an end to strikes that go on too long.
Join in on the most popular conversations.