Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Response rates from 850 Ajax - Pickering voters.
51% Yes |
49% No |
51% Yes |
44% No |
0% Yes, but fine companies that employ illegal immigrants |
4% No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities |
0% Yes but decrease the amount of sanctuary cities. |
0% No, and all federal funding is unconstitutional |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 850 Ajax - Pickering voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 850 Ajax - Pickering voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Ajax - Pickering voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9K6JKN311mos11MO
No. Those cities should use the people for some jobs to maintain those cities. Start assimilating them in to the culture sooner than later.
@9FN75NH1yr1Y
dont think this applies to canada?
@Canadianpunk89 2mos2MO
No, except for the ones who have legal status or if they fled from their home country due to an active war or a legit life and death situation.
@9HCP7QV1yr1Y
No. We should ban Sanctuary Cities, and Municipalities are under Provincial jurisdiction - the Federal government should not be infringing on Provincial matters.
@9H8JPC21yr1Y
Depending on the situation of an individual, there may be circumstances where they must live undocumented. So funding should be the same throughout each city.
@9H4KM541yr1Y
There should not be sanctuary cities. We wouldn't need them if the government would slow down on letting so many people into the Canada.
@9V798RX4mos4MO
Yes, but have these cities closely monitored, screen the people before entering, and limit the number of sanctuary cities.
@9V2YV4B4mos4MO
I don’t want federal funding if it comes with control—let cities do their own thing without strings attached.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
