Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 1.7k T3K voters.
17% Yes |
83% No |
14% Yes |
78% No |
3% Yes, any citizen that pays taxes should be allowed to vote |
4% No, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote |
1% No, it should be raised |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.7k T3K voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.7k T3K voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from T3K voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@8KQL6XN4yrs4Y
There are some incredibly smart kids that know more than the average adult about worldly topics and politics. Perhaps, when younger aged, they can write a short and simple test to show their competence in order to vote.
@9ZDNVZN4 days4D
16 should be the youngest age. If they start voting before leaving home, they may continue after they leave home. I so badly wanted to vote at age 16.
@9ZBHBNV5 days5D
Yes, and there should be a maximum voting age after which voters get disenfranchised. If you have no stake in the future, your opinion does not matter.
@9YNCRS76 days6D
No, there should be a test demonstrating their basic understanding of politics but if failed should only warn the individual they shouldn't vote but still let them
@9YCMSKN1wk1W
No it should there should be a iq and eq test to make sure the individual is smart enough to vote. cause some people at 15 are more mature than a grown adult. i think it should be over 15 though.
@9WGXHQL3wks3W
No, if you do or do not pay taxes you should still be allowed to vote only if you are the right age to vote.
@9VWBXVR1mo1MO
No, there should be however more accessibility to current political platforms. Continual unbiased updates in schools, social platforms, signage, etc.
@9VVJGFW1mo1MO
Voting age should match military age. If you are old enough to carry a weapon in the army you are old enough to vote
Join in on the most popular conversations.
