Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 33.5k Green voters.
15% Yes |
85% No |
7% Yes |
76% No |
7% Yes, if the landowners are fairly compensated |
6% No, do not build the pipeline and shut down all oil production in the tar sands |
1% Yes, the pipeline is necessary for the economic future of Canada |
3% No, do not build the pipeline but allow oil production in the tar sands |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 33.5k Green voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 33.5k Green voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Green voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@8VJ7MXZ3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if they consent and are compensated for it
@B2BMK7B3wks3W
Yes but only if the landowners are fairly compensated & all Indigenous bands in the area agree to it.
@B2B253S3wks3W
Landowners deserve the rights of their lands, and should only be removed from it if they agree to it with fair compensation. The pipeline can always be redirected.
@9JZP7TY12mos12MO
Only if there are no alternative solutions and only if the property owners are fairly compensated. the economy is important for the future of Canadians
@9JQ8T5J12mos12MO
Not, not unless the landowners are fairly compensated & all Indigenous communities in the area agree.
@9J34VJW1yr1Y
It should be supported if land owners are fairly compensated, and a reduction of oil production from tar sands.
@9GVMYT31yr1Y
No the government should respect private property. If a Private company wants to expropriate private property they must compensate a fair market prices
@9FT46P41yr1Y
A stronger discussion should be had between the government and the first nation peoples to make a compromise between the two parties. The land should be protected while also allowing the pipeline to be built elsewhere to provide employment for the first nations peoples surrounding the area of the pipeline.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
