Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 11.5k Victoria voters.
86% Yes |
10% No |
73% Yes |
8% No |
6% Yes, but only for low income families |
1% No, we cannot afford to add this at the moment |
4% Yes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded |
|
3% Yes, cover the overall prescription costs but have the patient pay the pharmacy dispensing costs |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 11.5k Victoria voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 11.5k Victoria voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Victoria voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B23CRQ32wks2W
No, we should only fund natural medicine. Prescription drugs have shown to be addictive and can lead to deaths from overdose.
@9GPVK6G1yr1Y
yes only when it is a high cost, they require the prescription to maintain their health and they cannot afford it
@9GNXXXT1yr1Y
Have a greater discussion with the provinces and territories to discuss how it should be rolled out, and build off of that.
@9GLXDZL1yr1Y
The prescription should be paid by the people who are being prescribed or have someone in need of a prescription.
@9GHTBSS1yr1Y
Yes but No, people could also be drug addicts so I still think you should pay for your medication however if you are not eligible to afford it then it should be covered.
@9G97MP91yr1Y
Ensure that patients will not become addicted, and also ensure that doctors or pharmacists are 100% certain that they are trying to help and not just make money.
@9G6PZWL1yr1Y
Cap the price of drugs, only offer coverage for low-income families for drugs with 0 potential for addiction.
@9FWHFLB1yr1Y
no, because if prescription drugs are covered people would buy more and possibly overdose on drug use. when people are gonna have to pay for their prescribed drugs they would buy less and less.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
