55% Yes |
45% No |
36% Yes |
45% No |
19% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
See how support for each position on “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 23.9k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 23.9k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9FL248Z8mos8MO
Use animals that will cause less public opinion to conduct experiments, and prohibit the use of endangered animals and nationally protected animals.
@98N25SY1yr1Y
Yes, but only for medical purposes such as vaccines, drug safety etc. But it should not be allowed for cosmetics. This should be allowed as long as the animals are being treated with care and not being treated as props.
@9MGN5662wks2W
I think they should only use animals that are suffering of a disease and will soon die but if they require a healthy animal then the use of healthy animals should be limited.
@9L8JRVW2mos2MO
Yes - not for cosmetics thought - and after they've reached a certain level of testing which shows confident results that the product would not be detrimental to the health of the animals.
@9KMLH9M3mos3MO
Yes, but only for things that are necessary to our lives, like vaccines, but not anything connected to cosmetics.
@9KDYD2W3mos3MO
Use proven criminals, convicted of violent crimes, who are in prison for 10+ years (or a life sentence)
Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.