+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.4k Trinity - Spadina voters.

71%
Yes
29%
No
62%
Yes
26%
No
6%
Yes, but not at the expense of farmland and green space
2%
No, rebuild or repair existing houses instead
2%
Yes, but only to house the homeless
2%
No, we cannot afford this right now

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.4k Trinity - Spadina voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.4k Trinity - Spadina voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Trinity - Spadina voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JW4BZRfrom Tennessee  answered…12mos12MO

Invest in higher density middle housing in cities instead of detached single family homes in the suburbs.

 @B2QQFP8from Ontario  answered…3 days3D

Large commie blocks and the forced relocation of new immigrant populations to interior Canada as to prevent large demographic concentrations.

 @B2PMF3Yfrom Ontario  answered…5 days5D

Yes, but we should also be helping regulate the purchase of these homes to prevent them being purchased as rental properties.

 @B2J26RYfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

It all depends on what types of homes at to be build - I would not be in favour of this if they were to be single family dwellings, but duplexes and smaller (non-luxury) apartments, yes 100%.

 @B2HTNHRfrom British Columbia  answered…2wks2W

Yes, but only for young students(or people under the age of 25) that are struggling with finding a place to live

 @B2HMZCYfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

The amount of homes being built versus the jobs available at despicable rates is disgraceful. This question ties in to several others, and the focal point for the general population is that nothing about any current policies benefits them.

 @B2CCM3Pfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

No, we should encourage private corporations by making it easier and less expensive to build homes rather then having to constantly spend tax-payer money.