+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 312 Left voters.

67%
Yes
33%
No
67%
Yes
33%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 312 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 312 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…4wks4W

Yes, so long as it doesnt cause more harm than good with excess emissions systems or phasing out of enthusiast vehicles like cars with V8s. we can also increase fuel efficiency in diesel trucks by 33% by removing the DEF systems from diesel vehicles, diesel vehicles already tend to be quite fuel efficient as well, doing so would be much better for the environment than building 2 engines per diesel vehicle because the DEF systems destroy the engines unnecessarily.

 @9VY5FM6answered…1mo1MO

Impose no, offer incentives not penalties for larger vehicles. I.e. pickup trucks...do not penalize by increasing insurance etc but allow for insurance breaks for vehicles that meet the fuel efficiency standard.

 @9V5Q48Yfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Meh...depends how important the transport is and how much it is used per day.

 @9V4L9WZfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

I believe the government should enforce this type of rule to make the world more clean but I also think that if it becomes a problem for families that aren't able to afford the demmand for new cars, they should get funding from the goverment or be excused from the standards until they are able to comply with the order.

 @9SLJBJVfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Only if those standards also dictate that the vehicle is comparably affordable to average people and working class poor.