+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 878 Burlington 170 voters.

82%
Yes
18%
No
76%
Yes
14%
No
6%
Yes, and do not privatize any services
3%
No, and implement a two tier public/private system
1%
No, and more services should be privatized

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 878 Burlington 170 voters.

Chart
Line chart with 7 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying Time. Range: 2015-08-27 21:21:36 to 2025-03-07 02:38:24.
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 878 Burlington 170 voters.

Chart
Line chart with 8 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying Time. Range: 2015-08-27 21:21:36 to 2025-03-07 02:38:24.
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Burlington 170 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4R4XY7Nfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase with direction towards more natural medicine/treatment to promote safety and reason.

 @9MFQG58from Saskatchewan  answered…9mos9MO

No healthcare should be free for everyone because people are really poor these days and can barely afford to live

 @B2R59GFfrom Manitoba  answered…2 days2D

They should prioritize spending on more important things, pay their staff more and have more doctors available

 @B2QH67Yfrom British Columbia  answered…3 days3D

Yes and spend less on foreign aid. Its good to help your neighbour, but if your house is in shambles, then what good is your help when you go home.

 @B2P8Y77from Alberta  answered…4 days4D

Allegate more taxpayer money to fund healthcare and reduce unnecessary spending in other departments.

 @B2LW7QGfrom Alberta  answered…6 days6D

Federal government doesn’t have to increase spending into our healthcare if they didn’t wastefully spend it but instead spent it back into our healthcare system like in the past.

 @B2K8W4Dfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

Not directly, but with priority funding being awarded to companies which demonstrate the most effective treatments, and funding private programs with disease and disorder prevention strategies

 @B2H27FGfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

NO, and non citizens should require to pay. If they cannot afford, then the bill passes down to a family member. Any non citizen in Canada that is here is given a 60 % higher income without working that a citizen. Some non citizen visitors receives 3000/mth, while AB gives 1000 welfare month and ONLY if your house makes UNDER 3000. EVEN though mortgage, bills, cost that.