@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHealthcare9yrs ago

Should healthcare be a provincial or federal responsibility?

48%
Provincial
50%
Federal
28%
Provincial
50%
Federal
20%
Provincial, but with federal funding and regulated standards

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Healthcare” has changed over time for 146k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Healthcare” has changed over time for 146k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @3QJ4DQGfrom Ontario answered…4yrs4Y

Provincial, but with a public/ private hybrid model.

 @9L4XKWXfrom Ontario answered…4mos4MO

I feel like it does not matter if it is provincial or federal, just as long as it is available to every citizen.

 @9FLZ4Q8from Alberta answered…10mos10MO

no healthcare walk it off

 @9FJ27B2from Ontario answered…10mos10MO

it should be under privet companies

 @9F928G6from Ontario answered…11mos11MO

Both. Healthcare is a human right.

 @9F87XWWfrom British Columbia answered…11mos11MO

doesn't matter but should be covered

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Healthcare” news articles, updated frequently.

 @M0derateImpala from Minnesota submitted…2mos2MO

Companies Cut Worker Hours After California’s $25-an-Hour Minimum-Wage

California's budget deficit has ballooned to $45 billion. Mr. Newsom projects that the new healthcare minimum wage would cost the state $4 billion more a year owing to higher Medicaid costs and compensation for workers at state-owned facilities. Legislative analyses warned about these costs, but Mr. Newsom signed the law anyway.California’s current minimum wage for all workers is $16 an hour. Nearly all workers at healthcare facilities including janitors will have to be paid at least $25 an hour by 2028.California’s wage minimums are another illustration of how progressive mandates boomerang. Average weekly earnings for leisure and hospitality employees in California have declined by 2.6% over the last year owing to a steep drop in hours worked. By contrast, those average weekly earnings rose 3% nationwide, 3.2% in Florida and 5.2% in Texas.California’s wage minimums are another illustration of how progressive mandates boomerang. Average weekly earnings for leisure and hospitality employees in California have declined by 2.6% over the last year owing to a steep drop in hours worked. By contrast, those average weekly earnings rose 3% nationwide, 3.2% in Florida and 5.2% in Texas.Average hourly earnings for California leisure and hospitality workers have also increased more slowly—2.1% compared to 3.8% nationwide—no doubt partly because the state’s softer labor market has reduced competition for workers.When government raises wages above what the market commands, employers will increase prices and reduce labor. California, QED.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.