+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1k K1S voters.

51%
Yes
49%
No
22%
Yes
47%
No
23%
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
2%
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
4%
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
2%
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1k K1S voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1k K1S voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from K1S voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9LZFDR6from Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, as long as the crime both was not commited whilst in office, and was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime.

 @8VJVJMRfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Depends on the circumstances. The person might be a member of a marginalized group and convicted out of hate and inequities in the society & justice system.

 @B2BMK7Bfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

Adopt the Israeli approach, end all forms of Qualified immunity, & ban all those convicted of a serious financial, violent, or sexual crime from running for or holding office at all levels of government.

 @B29WDC2from Alberta  answered…2wks2W

If its a serious crime ie (GTA, manslaughtler ect,) then no but if its little petty stuff the it should be fine

 @B29T5JYfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Yes, as long as they pass a psychological examination, and have been determined unlikely to offend again.

 @9T9X43Pfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Yes as long as they are finished serving BUT I do think it depends on what the crime is. If it's ex. murder or rape then NO WAY should you be allowed to run for office.

 @9T878LKfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

It depends on how severe the crime was as well as if there is standing proof that they have changed. Then yes.