@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 7yrs agoActive 3 days ago

Should the government increase spending on public transportation?

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Public Transportation

@9ZQV5PZ
#1 Engaged Voter
Test Your Knowledge

Answer Overview

Response rates from 594k Canada voters.

66%
Yes
34%
No
57%
Yes
28%
No
6%
Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions
3%
No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending
3%
Yes, and provide more free public transportation
2%
No, we have more important issues that need funding
1%
No, and we should privatize more public transportation services
0%
No, and we should reduce current spending

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 594k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 594k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8CTV8T7from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Make it free for under 16

 @8CSGLXNfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, as long as transit is made to be more affordable.

 @B3K9X78from Ontario  answered…3 days3D

It depends, but I think it should follow how the US does it when it comes to ensuring that people are paid properly because if we make people pay more, then it deters people but if things are made to be efficient, then people wouldn't mind paying more because it saves them time, but the main issue is putting that into action, so a temporary solution would be to update infrastructure by making old systems have proper network connections in the case of Japan's strategy and allowing people to spend an amount based on what's less expensive, instead of constantly raising taxes because of inflation, though I don't understand the question.

 @B3JY8KSfrom Ontario  answered…3 days3D

No. It's gonna be used for money laundering by the politicians. Deport the illegals, tighter immigration, and spend on infrastructure and it should be fixed.

 @B3G222Kfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

No, we should ensure that money is being used based on project progress. We can't just throw away money at a prolonged project taking place over 10 years

 @B3DJY38from Ontario  answered…1wk1W

More efficient public transportation. Faster/ cheaper options would alleviate the highway traffic congestion. Better rail options could get trucks off the roads. Highways for trucks or time restrictions (especially in the GTAA area. High speed train/ tunnel etc... We (in Canada, especially the Niagara-Toronto corridor) are desperately behind when comparing to the rest of the modern world. It's embarrassing!

 @B3CPZL7answered…1wk1W

Should the Ukraine president stops servicing of public transport however it needs with basics spending issues by Brazilian president blowout in based it cost current friendly solution is aren't ends

 @B2L44R6from British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

Yes for improving in specific areas like rural areas, or senior dense areas and making it eco friendly as well. Doesnt

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Public Transportation” news articles, updated frequently.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Dark Money Moves: Bloomberg’s Quiet $50M Bet on Harris Amid Billionaire Arm-Twisting

Michael R. Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, under extraordinary pressure from friends and fellow billionaires to do more to help Vice President Kamala Harris, recently donated about $50 million to a nonprofit organization that is supporting her presidential run, according to four people with knowledge of the matter.The donation followed months of arm-twisting from associates such as Bill Gates, investor Ron Conway and Reid Hoffman, the co-founder of LinkedIn. Mr. Bloomberg recently spoke with Ms. Harris in a private phone call, according to two people briefed on the conversation.Mr. Bloomberg’s decision conforms to a strategy that has become his trademark: Confounding Democratic operatives by refusing to make early investments — only to come in hot and heavy in the homestretch. But unlike his previous big gifts, this one was intended to be kept under wraps, and that secrecy has made unaware Democrats more anxious than they have been most autumns.His contribution was made to Future Forward USA Action, the dark-money vehicle of Future Forward, Ms. Harris’s main super PAC.Mr. Bloomberg, who is 82 years old and has an estimated net worth of $105 billion, is the second largest disclosed individual donor to Democrats in this election cycle, after the investor and philanthropist George Soros. But publicly, Democrats observed that Mr. Bloomberg was donating nowhere close to what he had spent during the presidency of Donald J. Trump.The $47 million he had given in federally disclosed political contributions during this election cycle, before his new nonprofit donation, was less than half of the $95 million he disclosed to help Democrats retake Congress in the 2018 midterms.And so in recent months, frustrated Democrats in his close orbit had urged him to consider a large donation to help Ms. Harris in an election expected to be decided by razor-thin margins. Mr. Bloomberg’s advisers, to say nothing of the man himself, have fielded jittery queries for months about what Democrats saw as his relatively conspicuous absence.

▲  611 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…5mos5MO

Mystery Drones Swarm a U.S. Military Bases

U.S. Air Force Gen. Mark Kelly wasn’t sure what to make of reports that a suspicious fleet of unidentified aircraft had been flying over Langley Air Force Base on Virginia’s shoreline.Kelly, a decorated senior commander at the base, got on a squadron rooftop to see for himself. He joined a handful of other officers responsible for a clutch of the nation’s most advanced jet fighters, including F-22 Raptors. For several nights, military personnel had reported a mysterious breach of restricted airspace over a stretch of land that has one of the largest concentrations of national-security facilities in the U.S. The show usually starts 45 minutes to an hour after sunset, another senior leader told Kelly.Officials didn’t know if the drone fleet, which numbered as many as a dozen or more over the following nights, belonged to clever hobbyists or hostile forces. Some suspected that Russia or China deployed them to test the response of American forces.Federal law prohibits the military from shooting down drones near military bases in the U.S. unless they pose an imminent threat. Aerial snooping doesn’t qualify, though some lawmakers hope to give the military greater leeway.Reports of the drones reached President Biden and set off two weeks of White House meetings after the aircraft first appeared in December last year. Officials from agencies including the Defense Department, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Pentagon’s UFO office joined outside experts to throw out possible explanations as well as ideas about how to respond.The first drone arrived shortly. Kelly, a career fighter pilot, estimated it was roughly 20 feet long and flying at more than 100 miles an hour, at an altitude of roughly 3,000 to 4,000 feet. Other drones followed, one by one, sounding in the distance like a parade of lawn mowers.The drones headed south, across Chesapeake Bay, toward Norfolk, Va., and over an area that includes the home base for the Navy’s SEAL Team Six and Naval Station Norfolk, the world’s largest naval port.

▲  289 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…8mos8MO

Trump Accuses Biden Harris Campaign of "Money Laundering"

The Trump campaign filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on Tuesday accusing President Biden and VP Kamala Harris of violating campaign finance laws with the transfer of $91 million in fundraising cash to her new campaign.According to the complaint, Harris is "seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million dollar heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash."Trump campaign general counsel David Warrington called the act a "brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended," adding "Kamala Harris is in the process of committing the largest campaign finance violation in American history and she is using the Commission’s own forms to do it.""The Commission must not and cannot sit idly by while one candidate takes nearly one hundred million dollars from the authorized committee of another, in violation of the Act and the will of the donors who gave the money in the first place."The complaint names Biden, Harris, "Biden for President (aka Harris for President) and Keana Spencer, as treasurer, for flagrantly violating the Act by making and receiving an excessive contribution of nearly one hundred million dollars, and for filing fraudulent forms with the Commission purporting to repurpose one candidate’s principal campaign committee for the use of another candidate."

▲  1513 replies