Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 1.6k Libertarian voters.
79% Yes |
21% No |
59% Yes |
21% No |
20% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.6k Libertarian voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.6k Libertarian voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Libertarian voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9J34VJW1yr1Y
The testing of vaccines, medical devices, and safety of drugs has been vital for scientific research, however, society needs to weigh the ethics of testing. Animals that are considered "pests" or have a large population, and similar anatomy of humans should be supported, while protecting more vulnerable species. Research that can benefit human lives should be prioritized over cosmetics.
@9FL248Z1yr1Y
Use animals that will cause less public opinion to conduct experiments, and prohibit the use of endangered animals and nationally protected animals.
@9RCRJ4F6mos6MO
Definitely not for cosmetics, and not for situations where the substance places humans at little risk. All other options should be considered before animal testing, it should be an essential need for examining the action of the product or process.
@9FPG8CX1yr1Y
Yes, BUT we must increase oversight to ensure that it is done ethically
@9FHP9H81yr1Y
Only those animals who have been bred for the purpose of scientific testing, and ensure it is done as ethically as possible.
@9FFRDFV1yr1Y
Yes, only of it is ethical and does not harm the animal
@9FFQHPC1yr1Y
it depends on the types of products being used. if it is likely to harmfully affect the animal, it should not be allowed
@98N25SY2yrs2Y
Yes, but only for medical purposes such as vaccines, drug safety etc. But it should not be allowed for cosmetics. This should be allowed as long as the animals are being treated with care and not being treated as props.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
