Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 402 People’s Party voters.
28% Yes |
72% No |
28% Yes |
72% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 402 People’s Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 402 People’s Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from People’s Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B35Q7K52wks2W
Gov't should reward companies/owner-operators for making more eco-friendly choices to encourage demand for options that are better for environment
@B2R65344wks4W
Yes because diesel engines emit high levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter, which contribute to smog and respiratory illnesses.
@B2CMT6Q 2mos2MO
Yes, while diesel is more fuel efficient than gasoline it produces more carbon dioxide emissions than gasoline does.
@B23B8DT3mos3MO
climate change is a joke and implementing more harsher policies will only be more costly for not only citizens but these policies are expensive to put into place
@9ZMRC283mos3MO
Government should work towards making infastrucutre to support a smooth transition to electric cars for citizens
@9ZH2FNQ4mos4MO
diesel vehicles are the best they shouldnt have stricter standards
@9ZG8R7Q4mos4MO
Essential equipment and services like farming and heavy transportation should be exempt. Personal diesels should have Stricker standards.
@9ZF4M8J4mos4MO
Whatever they choose to do should not impact the working class any more than industry
Join in on the most popular conversations.
