Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 2.5k Left voters.
69% Yes |
31% No |
69% Yes |
31% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.5k Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.5k Left voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2CMT6Q 3wks3W
Yes, while diesel is more fuel efficient than gasoline it produces more carbon dioxide emissions than gasoline does.
@B23B8DT2mos2MO
climate change is a joke and implementing more harsher policies will only be more costly for not only citizens but these policies are expensive to put into place
@9ZMRC282mos2MO
Government should work towards making infastrucutre to support a smooth transition to electric cars for citizens
@9ZH2FNQ3mos3MO
diesel vehicles are the best they shouldnt have stricter standards
@9ZG8R7Q3mos3MO
Essential equipment and services like farming and heavy transportation should be exempt. Personal diesels should have Stricker standards.
@9ZF4M8J3mos3MO
Whatever they choose to do should not impact the working class any more than industry
@9TP4MHS5mos5MO
Yes, but should also start reducing diesel vehicals in general
@9NSN4GZ8mos8MO
No, emission or not safer environmental methods are not clear yet
Join in on the most popular conversations.
