+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 137 Chilliwack--Hope voters.

77%
Yes
23%
No
77%
Yes
23%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 137 Chilliwack--Hope voters.

Chart
Line chart with 4 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 137 Chilliwack--Hope voters.

Chart
Line chart with 5 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Chilliwack--Hope voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2LYYGRfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3wks3W

All robots should obey Asimov's three laws of robotics, all AI machines included, the manufacturer would need to prove that for a product to be approved, but enforcement shouldn't necessarily be federal, it could be at any level, depending on the application.

 @B32LQWPfrom Ontario  answered…4 days4D

no, we should just stop it from upgrading further UNLESS it can be used for good. (like healthcare ect)

 @B2ZJH9Gfrom Ontario  answered…5 days5D

if it is used to test certain things dangerous yes use ai / machine but if there using it for everything no dont us ai becuase most of it is horrible

 @B2XYXK2from Alberta  answered…7 days7D

I believe the market of ai should be better handled by the government, so it's not held by purely monopolies, and don't believe ethics is a large part of it.

 @B2XG4KGfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

If we give the problem to someone else to solve we won't learn the lesson we need to from solving the problem with our own solution.

 @B2VL9PLfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

The government should not exist and the people should police their own AI developments, burning the houses of those psychopathic individuals who crave wealth and boundary breaking.

 @B2VF4BFfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Yes, to protect people's privacy, but not to the point that innovation and technological advancement is hindered

 @B2TS86Rfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

yes and no because students can be using it and it can be a waste of time but maybe regulating it a bit Incase its teaching people harmful things