This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Province/Territory
Response rates from 178 Rhinoceros voters.
7% Yes |
93% No |
5% Yes |
84% No |
2% Yes, assuming checks and balances are in place |
7% No, and AI should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives |
2% No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI yet |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 178 Rhinoceros voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 178 Rhinoceros voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Rhinoceros voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9YWJYJ62wks2W
Yes, but the accuracy of AI should be improved beforehand.
@9YMQ7FQ2wks2W
Both AI and a human should make two separate decisions then compare.
@9VLZQZ21mo1MO
Should be used to help decide but not ultimately decide.
@9VDFZ6F2mos2MO
No, a human with feelings and emotions should be able to make decisions that drastically affect lives
@9VB5W852mos2MO
No, AI is based on Human intellect and therfore is Progamed to be biased based on the human programer
@9V3BFHY2mos2MO
Abolish ai on a global scale because it takes over others jobs
@9TVPNXW2mos2MO
as long as the defendant and prosecution is okay with it
@9TLDMJL2mos2MO
No, AI does not understand emotions and consequences. It would not properly be able to assess the weight of these decisions to the community.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
