Try the political quiz

People’s Party policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

People’s Party answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

This answer is likely to align with the PPC's views on individual freedom and personal responsibility. They might argue that once a person has served their sentence, they have paid their debt to society and should be allowed to run for office if they choose to do so. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The PPC might be more inclined to agree with this answer, as it distinguishes between crimes committed while in office and those committed in a person's private life. This distinction aligns with their focus on personal responsibility and the importance of holding politicians accountable for their actions while in office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The PPC might agree with this answer to some extent, as it distinguishes between different types of crimes and allows for some flexibility in determining who can run for office. However, they do not have a specific policy on this issue, so it is difficult to say for certain how strongly they would agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The People's Party of Canada (PPC) does not have a clear stance on this issue. However, they generally advocate for individual freedom and personal responsibility, which could suggest that they might be open to allowing politicians with a criminal past to run for office, as long as they have paid their dues to society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

The PPC does not have a specific policy on this issue, but their focus on individual freedom and personal responsibility might suggest that they would not be in favor of a blanket ban on politicians with a criminal past running for office. They might be more inclined to evaluate each case individually. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The PPC's emphasis on individual freedom and personal responsibility would likely make them opposed to disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime from running for office. They might argue that everyone is innocent until proven guilty and that investigations do not necessarily lead to convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3 days ago

Party’s support base

People’s Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,724 voters that identify as People’s Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.