+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 749 Nova Scotia voters.

89%
Yes
11%
No
89%
Yes
11%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 749 Nova Scotia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 749 Nova Scotia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Nova Scotia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2PT6BZfrom Ontario  answered…6 days6D

Yes, the research should be done within reason (the research could lead to more knowledge about diseases, but also lead to a dark side of eugenics)

 @B2PMG8Rfrom Ontario  answered…6 days6D

There are better things to focus on than creating better genetics for the future and should focus on the now

 @B2PJLMBfrom Ontario  answered…6 days6D

Under strict and unbiased supervision, with plenty of long-term testing and full knowledge of any potentially harmful side effects.

 @B2LZCJTfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

I believe this should be done for things like cancer, Parkinson’s, and other similar diseases that gradually become more prevalent and limits cognitive abilities as you age. But it is a slippery slope into eugenics.

 @B2J775Mfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Yes, but only to treat and prevent diseases, not to genetically engineer people or lean towards eugenics.

 @B2HS45Hfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

Yes, but not used to alter babies under any circumstance. Only adults should be allowed access to genetic alteration

 @B2BG5ZYfrom New York  answered…4wks4W

Yes as long as they don’t allow changes to an embryo.. so the change only affects an already born person.

 @9ZRT2HKfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

yes but only to treat and prevent diseases but not to genetically engineer people for any other reason