+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 201 Ottawa - Vanier voters.

86%
Yes
14%
No
86%
Yes
14%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 201 Ottawa - Vanier voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 201 Ottawa - Vanier voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Ottawa - Vanier voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2PT6BZfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

Yes, the research should be done within reason (the research could lead to more knowledge about diseases, but also lead to a dark side of eugenics)

 @B2PMG8Rfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

There are better things to focus on than creating better genetics for the future and should focus on the now

 @B2PJLMBfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

Under strict and unbiased supervision, with plenty of long-term testing and full knowledge of any potentially harmful side effects.

 @B2LZCJTfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

I believe this should be done for things like cancer, Parkinson’s, and other similar diseases that gradually become more prevalent and limits cognitive abilities as you age. But it is a slippery slope into eugenics.

 @B2J775Mfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Yes, but only to treat and prevent diseases, not to genetically engineer people or lean towards eugenics.

 @B2HS45Hfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

Yes, but not used to alter babies under any circumstance. Only adults should be allowed access to genetic alteration

 @B2BG5ZYfrom New York  answered…4wks4W

Yes as long as they don’t allow changes to an embryo.. so the change only affects an already born person.

 @9ZRT2HKfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

yes but only to treat and prevent diseases but not to genetically engineer people for any other reason