+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 280 Outremont voters.

86%
Yes
14%
No
86%
Yes
14%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 280 Outremont voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 280 Outremont voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Outremont voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B2W3N3Hfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

Yes but with appropriate safeguarding to protect individuals and their genetic makeup and ensure there is no negatives with having genetic material available to insurance companies.

 @B2VNVNWfrom British Columbia  answered…1wk1W

Only if they are willing to commit money to social programs that keep unhealthy people housed and cared for. Just because you treat a disease and prolong life doesn’t mean the quality of life is great.

 @B2V8SXTfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

Maybe a little bit for more serious diseases, but everything must be done ethically, so it might be better if it was done privately. Still ethically.

 @B2SXCQRfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

It's too diverse of a question to be filtered into a yes or no. Science has the change to have a negative impact

 @B2PT6BZfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Yes, the research should be done within reason (the research could lead to more knowledge about diseases, but also lead to a dark side of eugenics)

 @B2PMG8Rfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

There are better things to focus on than creating better genetics for the future and should focus on the now

 @B2PJLMBfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Under strict and unbiased supervision, with plenty of long-term testing and full knowledge of any potentially harmful side effects.

 @B2LZCJTfrom Ontario  answered…3wks3W

I believe this should be done for things like cancer, Parkinson’s, and other similar diseases that gradually become more prevalent and limits cognitive abilities as you age. But it is a slippery slope into eugenics.