Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Domestic Policy › Government Surveillance
3>3 Personal answerYes, but only by court order |
Healthcare › Prescription Drugs
3>3 Personal answerYes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded |
Education › University Tuition
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Environmental Regulation
3>3 Personal answerWhy focus on businesses? Economic incentives that effect all persons are key, and among them should be rewards for environmental innovations and r&d money for the greening of the economy. Government has to manage these issues. There is no other power to check the greed and laziness that business and citizen alike are prone to. |
Healthcare › Dental Coverage
3>3 Personal answerYes |
the Environment › Logging
3>3 Personal answerYes, but only in sustainable quantities ... i.e if the trees take 100 years to grow, the maximum harvest has to be less than 1/100th per year. Each annual harvest should also have to surpass additional standards respecting biodiversity and the impact of the harvest itself. |
the Economy › Corporate Tax
3>3 Personal answerLower, but eliminate deductions and loop holes |
Domestic Policy › Native Funding
3>3 Personal answerNo, and we should slowly phase out funding |
the Environment › Keystone Pipeline
3>3 Personal answerExpropriation is necessary if there is to be a pipeline. But why build a pipeline that exports jobs out of the country? I would support a pipeline if the profits and benefits were Canadain first. I am not keen on allowing a foreign owned company extract wealth from our country. |
Social › Niqāb
3>3 Personal answerallow, with the condition that, at certain events, security might require proof of identity before permitting access |
the Environment › Renewable Energy
3>3 Personal answerSubsidize with money from taxes on the least attractive energy sources. Across the sector there should be fiscal balance. |
Domestic Policy › Quebec Sovereignty
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Northern Gateway Pipeline
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Immigration
3>3 Personal answerYes, but make the process easier for skilled workers |
Domestic Policy › Commuter Rail
3>3 Personal answerYes |
the Economy › Pension Tax
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Elections › Campaign Finance
3>3 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Free Trade
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Parole Hearings
3>3 Personal answereligible? well, ok, eligible isnt setting the bar very high ... but the onus must remain on the convicts to prove they have capacity to make a legal life. To that end, prison reform is needed so that there is a "pre-release" level that must be successfully completed. The convict would be required to hold a (in prison) job, manage a paycheck, cook, clean & manage a living space. Successfully passing psychological tests would be required, as would the convict making a proposal as to future career, a proposal that would be mandatory for the future upon release. Finally, release would also have an initial stage of close supervision while the proposal is put into action. |
the Economy › Economic Stimulus
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › National Daycare
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › Energy Sector
3>3 Personal answerNo reason it can't be mixed. |
Education › Postsecondary Education
3>3 Personal answerProvincially managed but with federal standards to ensure consistency |
Foreign Policy › Bill C-51
3>3 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Electoral Reform
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
3>3 Personal answerIncrease when the money is well used in a fiscal management sense and the object meets with our values. |
the Economy › Employment Insurance
3>3 Personal answerWe should be moving towards guaranteed minimum income. Folks who make a bunch of money in a few months should not get my taxes just because they dont manage what they have. |
Domestic Policy › Senate
3>3 Personal answerElect |
the Economy › Pension Premiums
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Long Form Census
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Domestic Policy › Copyright
3>3 Personal answerYes, but the period during which their intellectual property should be far shorter and subject to some conditionsm such as nor burying a product. |
Transportation › Commercial Drones
3>3 Personal answerYes |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked more important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.