Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
5>5 Personal answerPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Social › Gay Marriage
5>5 Personal answerYes, but allow the uptight and close-minded churches the right to refuse performing the ceremony. But I don't know why Catholics would forbid it, especially considering all their same-sex priest-boy scandals. Lastly, why shouldn't persons of every sexual preference have the right to be miserable in marriage too, and to be cleaned out in divorce? |
Social › LGBT Adoption Rights
5>5 Personal answerYes, as long as they pass the same background checks as straight couples. Additionally, I'd imagine the donor-parent might want to know. If they do, they might want that right. |
Foreign Policy › Mandatory Military Service
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment, and also for those building a criminal record. |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
5>5 Personal answerYes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, training, and close the gun show and other loopholes. Seize black market guns. Imprison black market dealers/sellers. Assault rifles should be restricted to military use; they're not needed to hunt a deer. Explore fingerprint-enabling, matched to cleared IDs. Additionally, if someone passionately wants to exercise their right to bear arms, they can join the military and do it there. |
Social › Euthanasia
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
5>5 Personal answerYes, and adjust it every year according to inflation |
Social › Gender Identity
5>5 Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to protect minorities from discrimination |
Social › Gender Workplace Diversity
5>5 Personal answerNo, board members should be the most qualified regardless of gender |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
5>5 Personal answerYes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests |
Social › Women in Combat
5>5 Personal answerYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men |
Immigration › Immigrant Assimilation
5>5 Personal answerYes |
Immigration › Muslim Immigrant Ban
5>5 Personal answerNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
the Environment › Fracking
5>5 Personal answerNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead |
Social › Death Penalty
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes (murder and the like) with undeniable evidence. Letting the victim's family make their will known should also be taken under consideration, but they do not become judge and jury. |
Domestic Policy › Drug Policy
5>5 Personal answerYes, the mild/harmless ones (marijuana). Also, retroactively reduce sentences for those serving time for the non-violent drug-related offenses (excluding dealing) - if those prisoners have been suitably rehabilitated. |
Domestic Policy › Net Neutrality
5>5 Personal answerNo, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet |
Healthcare › Marijuana
5>5 Personal answerYes, and legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it |
the Economy › Labor Unions
5>5 Personal answerHelp, but ban their ability to make political donations |
Immigration › Skilled Immigrants
5>5 Personal answerIncrease, our economy relies on businesses hiring the highest skilled workers at the lowest cost |
the Economy › Government Spending
5>5 Personal answerYes (where redundancies can be eliminated, where streamlining can help, and increase taxes on the wealthiest people/corporations, tax churches and any other corporation mislabeled as a charity. Also, quit funding ethanol, sugar, and the like. If the farmers want a more profitable crop, grow whatever's popular. |
Science › Nuclear Energy
5>5 Personal answerNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Foreign Policy › Foreign Aid
5>5 Personal answerDecrease, until we drastically reduce our national budget deficit |
the Economy › Offshore Banking
5>5 Personal answerNo, too many wealthy citizens, corporations, and business orgs are abusing loopholes in offshore banking laws to evade taxes. |
Crime › Criminal Voting Rights
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation |
the Economy › Trans-Pacific Partnership
5>5 Personal answerNo, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country |
the Economy › Bitcoin
5>5 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. This theme is only least important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked more important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked somewhat important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.